**Trump's Second Presidency: A Promise to Protect or a Threat to Peace?**

As Donald Trump embarks on his second presidential term, he faces scrutiny over his claims of fostering global peace amidst rising tensions in key conflict zones.

When Donald Trump was inaugurated for a second term as President of the United States, he declared his intention to be a "peacemaker and unifier," a promise he reaffirmed during his first international trip shortly thereafter. Over a hundred days into his presidency, he proclaimed, "the world is a much safer place right now," citing the ongoing situation in Ukraine and hinting at a potential resolution within weeks.

However, the reality of peace remains elusive, sparking an important question: Is Trump genuinely making the world safer or is he contributing to increased volatility? The answer unfolds with various perspectives to consider.

Observing the current state of two high-profile conflicts, the situation appears troubling. Trump's assertion that he alone has the negotiating power with Russian President Vladimir Putin falters against the backdrop of Russia’s intensifying attacks on Ukraine. As hostilities escalate, reports indicate that the Red Cross is treating record numbers of weapon-wounded patients in Gaza, countering Trump’s calls for a ceasefire.

Despite the frightening dynamics in these conflicts, some analysts maintain that negotiations may still be possible. Notably, talks between the U.S. and Iran are moving forward under Trump’s approach, aimed at achieving a viable agreement to prevent further escalation. Although the negotiations are expected to continue this weekend, the specter of potential Israeli military action against Iran adds an unpredictable element.

David Harland, from the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, describes the current global landscape as showcasing "the worst of times and the best of times," with numerous conflicts yet also opportunities for dialogue emerging in various arenas. Trump's unique ability to incite discussions among global adversaries, including notable figures like Putin and Netanyahu, positions him as a pivotal character in international relations.

Supporters of Trump, like his former deputy national security adviser K.T. McFarland, argue that his "peace through strength" strategy—centered on assertive diplomacy and powerful rhetoric—could reclaim stability. While Trump insists that negotiations can yield quick results, more experienced diplomats express concerns over his lack of engagement with the complexities of peace agreements.

The ex-president's preference for swift deals sometimes clashes with the intricacies required for long-lasting solutions. As noted by Martin Griffiths, former UN Under-Secretary General, true peace requires dedication and resilience, which Trump's approach often neglects.

Despite some successes, like facilitating a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, Trump's actions raise alarms. His trade policies have disrupted long-standing alliances and stoked economic tensions globally. Critics suggest that his focus on individual deals can result in overlooking the deep-rooted issues that drive ongoing strife, particularly in regions like Sudan and Congo.

Moreover, as his administration cuts aid to crucial humanitarian efforts, exacerbating the plight of displaced populations, Trump’s frustration with progress has led him to consider walking away from negotiations entirely.

As the debate over Trump’s impact on global safety unfolds, the critical examination of his presidency highlights the dual realities of potential peace and increasing peril. The BBC World Service will host a debate to delve deeper into these conflicting perceptions of Trump's role as a global leader and the implications of his policies in a rapidly changing world.