The U.S. State Department has initiated the transfer of over $8 billion in arms to Israel, prompting criticism regarding the bypassing of legislative review processes.
Trump Administration Expedites $8 Billion Arms Sale to Israel, Ignoring Congressional Oversight
![](https://static01.nyt.com/images/2025/02/08/multimedia/08dc-trump-israel-weapons-jzlq/08dc-trump-israel-weapons-jzlq-mediumSquareAt3X.jpg)
Trump Administration Expedites $8 Billion Arms Sale to Israel, Ignoring Congressional Oversight
Controversial arms sales follow Trump-Netanyahu meeting, raising alarms over congressional authority.
The U.S. State Department announced its intent to move forward with an arms sales package exceeding $8 billion to Israel, a decision made just two days after President Trump held discussions with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The sales include 3,000 Hellfire air-to-ground missiles valued at $660 million, along with $6.75 billion in bombs and guidance kits. Furthermore, the Pentagon has planned a separate sale of artillery shells that did not require formal publishing.
Originally, this arms package was presented by the Biden administration last January and was subsequently sent for informal review to the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. While initial approvals came from Republican leaders on both committees and some Democratic support, Representative Gregory W. Meeks, the top Democrat on the House committee, opted to leverage the review process to seek further clarification and documentation regarding the sales.
This review process typically allows lawmakers a 20-day consideration period, but the administration proceeded with the sales despite ongoing inquiries from Meeks, who has voiced strong concerns regarding the administration's perceived disregard for Congressional authority. He remarked that the federal government had not adequately communicated or justified its actions during the review.
The State Department's actions are legally within its rights; however, Meeks criticized the erosion of established congressional prerogatives, noting that while he supports Israel's defense needs in light of regional threats, his approval is contingent upon proper oversight and demand for transparency. Such developments signal potential tensions between the executive branch and Congress over arms sales, with significant implications for U.S.-Israel relations and regional dynamics in the Middle East.