The freeze on foreign aid initiated by the Trump administration receives temporary backing from the Supreme Court. This controversial move affects numerous aid programs globally and is part of a broader strategy to reduce federal spending.
Supreme Court Upholds Temporary Freeze on Foreign Aid Amid Trump's Cost-Cutting Measures

Supreme Court Upholds Temporary Freeze on Foreign Aid Amid Trump's Cost-Cutting Measures
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice supports Trump administration's suspension of foreign aid payments, amid sweeping budget cuts and program reviews.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts has granted temporary support to the Trump administration's freeze on foreign aid payments as a midnight deadline looms for processing contractor payments. The administration argues that fulfilling these obligations is not administratively feasible within the timeframe set by a lower court. Since taking office, President Donald Trump has moved swiftly to terminate various aid programs primarily overseen by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), leading to numerous layoffs within the agency.
The Chief Justice's ruling underscores ongoing judicial interventions regarding Trump's directives, particularly the closure and review of many veteran foreign aid initiatives. Concerns have been raised about the potential ramifications of such cutbacks, which align with the administration's broader goal of diminishing the federal workforce and curbing expenditure, a campaign spearheaded by billionaire advisor Elon Musk.
In a contentious turn of events, recent orders from US District Judge Amir Ali directed the State Department and USAID to fulfill approximately $2 billion in pending bills by a tight deadline. As the Trump administration escalates its actions to revise foreign aid funding, they claim that the judge's order disrupts an otherwise systematic review process.
This freeze has led to a significant retraction in the global aid framework, affecting hundreds of programs worldwide. With the US being a key provider of humanitarian assistance, the implications of this freeze could resonate throughout numerous countries that rely on American support. The administration is reportedly seeking to eliminate more than 90% of USAID's foreign aid contracts, totaling an estimated $60 billion in overseas assistance.