The former FIFA president and UEFA head defend their actions as legitimate, citing a prior acquittal and a gentlemen's agreement.
**Blatter and Platini Return to Court in Swiss Fraud Case**

**Blatter and Platini Return to Court in Swiss Fraud Case**
Sepp Blatter and Michel Platini face renewed legal scrutiny in an appeal hearing concerning allegations of fraudulent conduct related to a disputed payment.
Sepp Blatter and Michel Platini have re-entered the Swiss legal system to confront accusations of fraud more than a year after their acquittal on similar charges. The former FIFA president and the renowned French footballer are in Muttenz for a new trial which could last until Thursday, with a verdict anticipated on March 25. The focus of the case is a disputed payment of 2 million Swiss francs (£1.6 million), which Blatter authorized in 2011 as compensation for Platini’s advisory role at FIFA, a claim both men maintain is legitimate.
During the proceedings, Blatter, now 88, reiterated his innocence, asserting that he has never engaged in deception. Platini's attorney argued that the previous court's decision was correct in recognizing the payment as lawful, emphasizing their belief in the integrity of the transaction. Platini, who boasts a legendary career that includes winning the Ballon d'Or three times, served as the president of UEFA before becoming embroiled in the fraud accusations alongside Blatter.
The origins of the controversy trace back to 2015 when both figures were accused of misleading FIFA regarding the payments. In earlier hearings, Blatter stated that he initially sought Platini's consultancy services in 1998 but could not afford the fees requested. After years of waiting, in 2011, Platini issued an invoice to FIFA which was eventually approved by Blatter as the organization found itself in a better financial position.
Following these events, investigations led to ethics charges against the duo, resulting in suspensions from football management. However, in 2022, they were acquitted after the court accepted their explanation of a gentlemen's agreement regarding the disputed payment. With this new trial marking another critical chapter in their tumultuous careers, the reputations and legacies of both men hang in the balance as they seek to dispel allegations that tarnish the world of football governance.