A recent ruling from a New Hampshire judge has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's effort to eliminate birthright citizenship for certain US residents. This ruling followed a class action lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), representing immigrant parents and their newborns against the executive order announced by Trump. The lawsuit came as a response to the Supreme Court's recent limitations on how federal courts can issue universal injunctions, which may impact the reach of such judicial decisions.
Judge Halts Trump's Birthright Citizenship Executive Order Amid Legal Challenges

Judge Halts Trump's Birthright Citizenship Executive Order Amid Legal Challenges
A New Hampshire judge intervenes to block Trump's executive order on citizenship as the ACLU advances a legal fight.
The underlying case argues that Trump's order violates the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution, which guarantees citizenship to all individuals born or naturalized in the US. Trump's initiative aimed to revoke citizenship rights for children born to undocumented immigrants and visitors, viewing it as part of a broader immigration crackdown. The judge has allowed this legal challenge to move forward, highlighting the potential implications for those who would be affected by these changes.
The ruling not only pauses Trump's executive order but also places pressure on the administration to respond, granting a week for the government to appeal. This case continues a contentious battle over immigration policies that have been a hallmark of Trump's presidency. Even after the Supreme Court limited the powers of federal judges to block presidential orders, this ruling underlines the ongoing debates about judicial authority and the constitutionality of immigration reforms.
The ruling not only pauses Trump's executive order but also places pressure on the administration to respond, granting a week for the government to appeal. This case continues a contentious battle over immigration policies that have been a hallmark of Trump's presidency. Even after the Supreme Court limited the powers of federal judges to block presidential orders, this ruling underlines the ongoing debates about judicial authority and the constitutionality of immigration reforms.