Voters in Santa Ana, California, turned down a proposal to expand voting rights to undocumented immigrants. Despite the city’s liberal reputation, skepticism about non-citizen voting prevails, reflecting broader tensions over immigration and civic representation in progressive areas.
Santa Ana Voters Reject Non-Citizen Voting Measure Amidst Divisive Debate

Santa Ana Voters Reject Non-Citizen Voting Measure Amidst Divisive Debate
The recent ballot measure in Santa Ana, California aimed at allowing undocumented immigrants to vote in local elections was decisively defeated, highlighting the complexities surrounding voting rights in immigrant-rich communities.
In a significant vote, residents of Santa Ana, California, have overwhelmingly rejected a proposed measure that sought to extend voting rights to undocumented immigrants in local elections, with only around one-third of the population in favor of the initiative. This proposal ignited considerable debate surrounding the concepts of voting rights and civic engagement, as it would have granted non-citizens the ability to participate in municipal elections—an adjustment that proponents claimed was crucial for accurately representing the city's diverse immigrant community.
Orange County, housing Santa Ana, is California's second-largest city, and voters decisively turned down this recent attempt to permit noncitizen voting. Advocates for the measure asserted that it would better amplify the collective voice of the community, arguing that given Santa Ana's demographic landscape, granting voting rights to undocumented residents is a necessary step towards inclusive democracy. Supporting organizations, including the San Francisco-based Chinese for Affirmative Action, voiced their dedication, stating that, “Immigrant voting cannot wait…especially in a place as diverse and immigrant-dense as Santa Ana.”
Despite this city being heavily Democratic—reporting that 50.7% of voters are registered as Democrats with independents making up 23.6%—the ballot measure was met with skepticism. This results point to a complex reality where even within progressive communities, the question of whether to grant voting rights to undocumented immigrants incites deep divisions. While Santa Ana is generally recognized for its liberal policies, the voting outcome suggests significant hesitancy among residents towards extending voting privileges in these cases.
The larger context of California's electoral battleground includes San Francisco, which has previously allowed non-citizen participation in school board elections since 2016—a law that stands despite persistent opposition. However, the measure in Santa Ana aimed for broader voting rights than those seen in San Francisco. In light of the recent voter response, similar proposals may encounter even more substantial resistance within other California municipalities.
As advocates of immigration reform argue that permitting non-citizen voting aligns with California’s ethos of inclusivity, critics argue that voting should remain a right exclusive to citizens. This reflects a continuing discourse around the rights of undocumented residents. Ultimately, the decisive feedback from Santa Ana voters hints that while there may be support for immigrant rights overall, the public sentiment is not in favor of extending such rights to local voting, even amidst pressing local issues.
The outcome in Santa Ana may potentially hinder similar proposals across the state, as those in favor of granting voting rights to non-citizens will have to confront a challenging landscape of public opinion, particularly in regions that espouse less progressive perspectives than Santa Ana.
Orange County, housing Santa Ana, is California's second-largest city, and voters decisively turned down this recent attempt to permit noncitizen voting. Advocates for the measure asserted that it would better amplify the collective voice of the community, arguing that given Santa Ana's demographic landscape, granting voting rights to undocumented residents is a necessary step towards inclusive democracy. Supporting organizations, including the San Francisco-based Chinese for Affirmative Action, voiced their dedication, stating that, “Immigrant voting cannot wait…especially in a place as diverse and immigrant-dense as Santa Ana.”
Despite this city being heavily Democratic—reporting that 50.7% of voters are registered as Democrats with independents making up 23.6%—the ballot measure was met with skepticism. This results point to a complex reality where even within progressive communities, the question of whether to grant voting rights to undocumented immigrants incites deep divisions. While Santa Ana is generally recognized for its liberal policies, the voting outcome suggests significant hesitancy among residents towards extending voting privileges in these cases.
The larger context of California's electoral battleground includes San Francisco, which has previously allowed non-citizen participation in school board elections since 2016—a law that stands despite persistent opposition. However, the measure in Santa Ana aimed for broader voting rights than those seen in San Francisco. In light of the recent voter response, similar proposals may encounter even more substantial resistance within other California municipalities.
As advocates of immigration reform argue that permitting non-citizen voting aligns with California’s ethos of inclusivity, critics argue that voting should remain a right exclusive to citizens. This reflects a continuing discourse around the rights of undocumented residents. Ultimately, the decisive feedback from Santa Ana voters hints that while there may be support for immigrant rights overall, the public sentiment is not in favor of extending such rights to local voting, even amidst pressing local issues.
The outcome in Santa Ana may potentially hinder similar proposals across the state, as those in favor of granting voting rights to non-citizens will have to confront a challenging landscape of public opinion, particularly in regions that espouse less progressive perspectives than Santa Ana.