The recent summit between EU leaders and China highlighted the growing rifts in their relationship, with significant discussions around trade imbalances and China's connection to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Despite calls for cooperation, the atmosphere remains charged due to recent sanctions and opposing viewpoints on geopolitical issues.
EU and China Relations at Crossroads Amid Summit Tensions

EU and China Relations at Crossroads Amid Summit Tensions
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Chinese President Xi Jinping meet in Beijing, addressing strained trade relations and geopolitical tensions.
The article text:
European Union's relationship with China is at a critical "inflection point," according to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen during her recent summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing. Von der Leyen emphasized that while cooperation has deepened, the imbalances—especially the EU's substantial trade deficit with China—have also grown. "The current challenges facing Europe do not originate from China," Xi countered, urging EU leaders to navigate their differences wisely.
Earlier in the year, hopes had emerged that under a potential Trump presidency, the EU and China might foster a stronger partnership. However, as time has progressed, relations have strained, partly due to tariffs imposed on EU exports to the US. During the summit, which was abruptly reduced in length to one day at China's request, a lack of expectations for substantial outcomes was evident.
The Great Hall of the People served as the backdrop for a dialogue where both von der Leyen and European Council President António Costa discussed the need for "real solutions" to ongoing issues. Von der Leyen's remarks about acknowledging mutual concerns echo the urgency both sides feel amid rising tensions. Xi reiterated the importance of "mutual trust," dismissing notions that decoupling economies would lead to progress, suggesting such actions would only foster isolation.
Trade issues dominated discussions, with last year's data reflecting a staggering €305.8 billion ($360 billion) deficit for the EU with China—an increase over the past nine years. As the EU faces challenges related to industrial overcapacity, von der Leyen underscored the necessity for enhancing market access for European firms while addressing export controls and overcapacity impacts.
Following the meeting, China's foreign ministry indicated a readiness to collaborate with other nations on export controls, marking a slight opening in the dialogue. However, the dynamics were overshadowed by the EU requesting China to leverage its influence with Russia regarding the wartime conflict in Ukraine. Von der Leyen explained that China's stance on Russia's actions would significantly shape future EU-China relations.
Despite the hopes expressed by von der Leyen upon her arrival, signaling an opportunity to "advance and rebalance," trust appears to have deteriorated, particularly following Xi's earlier refusal to join EU leaders in Brussels and his attendance at a Moscow event commemorating WWII. Engin Eroglu, from the European Parliament's China delegation, characterized the current atmosphere as "tense - if not frosty," reflecting the deeper strategic mistrust.
Trade tensions have escalated, with the recent EU sanctions against two Chinese banks affecting their role in supporting Russia, which has strained negotiations before the summit. Furthermore, sources revealed that China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi's comments, indicating preferences against a Russian defeat in Ukraine, contradict official neutrality policy, amplifying discord.
The EU's imposition of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles led to China's retaliatory measures against European goods, creating a cycle of escalating tensions. Simultaneously, China's restrictions on exports of rare earths and critical materials raised alarms in Europe, with concerns that Beijing might weaponize its dominant market position.
As these two major economies navigate a complex landscape of trade and geopolitical challenges, it remains an open question whether they can find a path toward a more balanced relationship in the future. The three-pronged characterization of China by the EU—cooperative partner, economic competitor, and systemic rival—reflects the intricate and conflicting dynamics that both sides must contend with as they seek to redefine their partnership in an increasingly polarized global environment.
European Union's relationship with China is at a critical "inflection point," according to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen during her recent summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing. Von der Leyen emphasized that while cooperation has deepened, the imbalances—especially the EU's substantial trade deficit with China—have also grown. "The current challenges facing Europe do not originate from China," Xi countered, urging EU leaders to navigate their differences wisely.
Earlier in the year, hopes had emerged that under a potential Trump presidency, the EU and China might foster a stronger partnership. However, as time has progressed, relations have strained, partly due to tariffs imposed on EU exports to the US. During the summit, which was abruptly reduced in length to one day at China's request, a lack of expectations for substantial outcomes was evident.
The Great Hall of the People served as the backdrop for a dialogue where both von der Leyen and European Council President António Costa discussed the need for "real solutions" to ongoing issues. Von der Leyen's remarks about acknowledging mutual concerns echo the urgency both sides feel amid rising tensions. Xi reiterated the importance of "mutual trust," dismissing notions that decoupling economies would lead to progress, suggesting such actions would only foster isolation.
Trade issues dominated discussions, with last year's data reflecting a staggering €305.8 billion ($360 billion) deficit for the EU with China—an increase over the past nine years. As the EU faces challenges related to industrial overcapacity, von der Leyen underscored the necessity for enhancing market access for European firms while addressing export controls and overcapacity impacts.
Following the meeting, China's foreign ministry indicated a readiness to collaborate with other nations on export controls, marking a slight opening in the dialogue. However, the dynamics were overshadowed by the EU requesting China to leverage its influence with Russia regarding the wartime conflict in Ukraine. Von der Leyen explained that China's stance on Russia's actions would significantly shape future EU-China relations.
Despite the hopes expressed by von der Leyen upon her arrival, signaling an opportunity to "advance and rebalance," trust appears to have deteriorated, particularly following Xi's earlier refusal to join EU leaders in Brussels and his attendance at a Moscow event commemorating WWII. Engin Eroglu, from the European Parliament's China delegation, characterized the current atmosphere as "tense - if not frosty," reflecting the deeper strategic mistrust.
Trade tensions have escalated, with the recent EU sanctions against two Chinese banks affecting their role in supporting Russia, which has strained negotiations before the summit. Furthermore, sources revealed that China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi's comments, indicating preferences against a Russian defeat in Ukraine, contradict official neutrality policy, amplifying discord.
The EU's imposition of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles led to China's retaliatory measures against European goods, creating a cycle of escalating tensions. Simultaneously, China's restrictions on exports of rare earths and critical materials raised alarms in Europe, with concerns that Beijing might weaponize its dominant market position.
As these two major economies navigate a complex landscape of trade and geopolitical challenges, it remains an open question whether they can find a path toward a more balanced relationship in the future. The three-pronged characterization of China by the EU—cooperative partner, economic competitor, and systemic rival—reflects the intricate and conflicting dynamics that both sides must contend with as they seek to redefine their partnership in an increasingly polarized global environment.