In a fervent response to recent U.S. military strikes, China has condemned the actions as damaging to American credibility and detrimental to ongoing diplomatic efforts with Iran.
**China Critiques U.S. Credibility Following Attack on Iran**
**China Critiques U.S. Credibility Following Attack on Iran**
Beijing denounces U.S. actions, highlighting its support for Tehran amid escalating tensions.
China's permanent representative to the United Nations, Fu Cong, expressed sharp criticism of the U.S. for attacking Iranian nuclear facilities during peace negotiations. He stated that such actions not only harm Iran but also undermine U.S. credibility in global diplomacy. "Iran is harmed, but also harmed is the U.S. credibility — as a country and as a party to any international negotiations," Fu remarked on a state broadcaster.
This statement is part of a broader narrative that China has often utilized, framing the U.S. as a warmongering entity while presenting itself as a supporter of global peace and fairness. At a recent emergency U.N. Security Council meeting, China announced its collaboration with Russia and Pakistan to draft a resolution aimed at achieving a ceasefire and fostering peace discussions.
Chinese state media echoed this sentiment, with Xinhua condemning the escalation of violence attributed to the U.S. actions. The Global Times, a Communist Party-affiliated publication, emphasized that the attack has destabilized the international security framework.
Despite this overt criticism, China's relationship with Iran is complicated, characterized by substantial economic ties. Beijing has been a significant buyer of Iranian oil, providing critical support to Iran's regime. Analysts speculate on China's ability to influence Iran amidst rising concerns about a wider conflict. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has urged China to dissuade Iran from threatening to close the Strait of Hormuz, which is crucial for global oil transportation.
Experts suggest that while China opposes the closure of the strait due to its own economic interests, it will approach the situation on its principles, avoiding pressure from the U.S. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun emphasized that the international community should work collaboratively to de-escalate tensions rather than rely on one-sided actions.
David Pierson has reported extensively on China’s foreign policy and international relations.
This statement is part of a broader narrative that China has often utilized, framing the U.S. as a warmongering entity while presenting itself as a supporter of global peace and fairness. At a recent emergency U.N. Security Council meeting, China announced its collaboration with Russia and Pakistan to draft a resolution aimed at achieving a ceasefire and fostering peace discussions.
Chinese state media echoed this sentiment, with Xinhua condemning the escalation of violence attributed to the U.S. actions. The Global Times, a Communist Party-affiliated publication, emphasized that the attack has destabilized the international security framework.
Despite this overt criticism, China's relationship with Iran is complicated, characterized by substantial economic ties. Beijing has been a significant buyer of Iranian oil, providing critical support to Iran's regime. Analysts speculate on China's ability to influence Iran amidst rising concerns about a wider conflict. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has urged China to dissuade Iran from threatening to close the Strait of Hormuz, which is crucial for global oil transportation.
Experts suggest that while China opposes the closure of the strait due to its own economic interests, it will approach the situation on its principles, avoiding pressure from the U.S. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun emphasized that the international community should work collaboratively to de-escalate tensions rather than rely on one-sided actions.
David Pierson has reported extensively on China’s foreign policy and international relations.
