The Trump administration is calling for federal prosecution of New York AG Letitia James, accusing her of mortgage fraud. James, previously victorious in a civil case against Trump for property valuation discrepancies, contends the referral is a politically motivated attack. While details have emerged, no formal charges have been filed at this time.
Trump Administration Pursues Criminal Charges Against New York AG Letitia James

Trump Administration Pursues Criminal Charges Against New York AG Letitia James
In a contentious move, the Trump administration has referred New York Attorney General Letitia James for criminal prosecution, alleging mortgage fraud related to property valuations.
The Trump administration has initiated a significant legal battle by referring New York Attorney General Letitia James for criminal prosecution on allegations of mortgage fraud. This controversial move includes accusations that James misrepresented the size of her New York property to secure more favorable loan terms, according to officials with the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA).
In the letter directed to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, FHFA Director William Pulte claims James falsely categorized a New York building as a four-unit property rather than the actual five units. Pulte further asserts that James improperly claimed her Norfolk, Virginia residence as her primary home in 2023, while serving as New York’s top prosecutor, seeking reduced interest rates on loans—typically advantageous for primary residences.
Attorney General James, who successfully sued Trump in 2023 for significantly inflating property values to obtain advantageous loans, maintains that the referral is a blatant misuse of governmental power. A spokesperson for James emphasized her commitment to upholding the law and defending New Yorkers against federal government overreach, unwilling to be intimidated by political adversaries.
Trump has made various statements characterizing James as a "wacky crook," demanding her immediate resignation from her post. Throughout his legal challenges since leaving office, he has often accused political opponents of manipulating the judicial framework against him. The White House confirmed the absence of any charges filed against James thus far, indicating that further information would emerge if the Justice Department decided to act.
This unfolding legal scenario occurs against a backdrop of claims that Trump’s family business engaged in fraud to manipulate loan and insurance conditions. In a prior civil case led by James, the courts found the Trump Organization liable for overstating the size of a penthouse and other assets, resulting in a judgment exceeding $350 million, a case currently under appeal.
In a separate matter, Trump was recently found guilty on multiple counts for mislabeling business records related to hush-money payments, adding further complexity to his legal troubles. His actions have included revoking security clearances of various officials involved in investigations against him and dismissing prosecutors connected with these matters.
The current accusations against James reflect ongoing tensions in the political and judicial arenas in the United States, with both sides claiming the other is misusing the legal system for political gain. As developments continue, the implications for both figures and the broader political landscape remain to be seen.