After facing significant opposition from various quarters, Australian opposition leader Peter Dutton has announced the withdrawal of his party’s plan to end work-from-home arrangements for public servants. This change comes as the coalition seeks to reframe its public service strategies ahead of the May 3 election.
Australian Opposition Leader Abandons Controversial Proposal to End Work from Home for Public Servants

Australian Opposition Leader Abandons Controversial Proposal to End Work from Home for Public Servants
Peter Dutton's decision to retract a policy aimed at eliminating remote work options was met with widespread criticism and backlash as he prepares for the upcoming election.
Australia's political landscape has shifted in light of the recent election campaign, as opposition leader Peter Dutton retracts a controversial promise to eliminate work-from-home options for public servants. The Liberal-National Coalition had proposed this policy alongside plans for thousands of job cuts, aiming to enhance public sector efficiency. However, the backlash prompted Dutton to acknowledge the misstep and apologize publicly.
During a press conference on Monday, Dutton stated, "We got it wrong and we have apologized for it." Initially, the policy had been framed as primarily affecting public service workers in Canberra, but Dutton accused the incumbent Labor government of exaggerating its implications through what he termed a "smear campaign."
In response to the public's concerns, Shadow Finance Minister Jane Hume clarified that the Coalition would no longer pursue any changes to current flexible working arrangements. "We have listened, and understand that flexible work, including work from home, is part of getting the best out of any workforce," she emphasized.
The Coalition has also faced ongoing scrutiny regarding its plan to cut 41,000 jobs from the public service. While a key figure hinted at the possibility of forced redundancies, Hume stated that, if elected, the party would aim for the job reductions to occur gradually over five years through a hiring freeze and natural attrition.
Contradictions arose during Dutton's remarks, as he admitted that the initial proposal about job cuts had been flawed. The Labor government seized on these inconsistencies during their campaign, with Employment Minister Murray Watt accusing Dutton of inconsistency, saying, "This just shows Peter Dutton is all over the shop."
Such policy debates reflect a broader international trend, where some government and corporate leaders have sought to limit remote work flexibility. For example, U.S. President Donald Trump demanded a full return to office work during his time in office, and companies like Amazon have enforced similar mandates. However, in Australia, recent polls indicate voters prioritize addressing cost-of-living challenges over workplace policies, necessitating a more cautious approach from political leaders.