As President Trump begins his second term, his foreign policy is increasingly influenced by a zero-sum mentality, viewing international relations as a game of winners and losers. This stark contrast to the established positive-sum dynamics challenges decades of international cooperation and raises questions about the future of global alliances.
The Trump Doctrine: A Zero-Sum Approach to Foreign Policy

The Trump Doctrine: A Zero-Sum Approach to Foreign Policy
President Trump's worldview reflects a zero-sum perspective on international relations, diverging sharply from traditional positive-sum principles.
Former President Donald Trump's approach to international relations signals a potential shift in America's role on the world stage. His philosophy can be summarized by a zero-sum mindset: where one party's gain is inherently associated with another's loss. This perspective starkly contrasts with a long-standing belief in a positive-sum game, where collaborative efforts can yield benefits for all involved parties, laying the groundwork for international trade, law, and alliances.
Historically, the United States has championed this positive-sum view. Since World War II, American foreign policy has largely focused on building coalitions and fostering an interconnected global economy. The aim has been to cultivate partnerships that enhance shared prosperity and peace. However, Trump's rhetoric and policies suggest a recalibration toward a zero-sum framework—one that may prioritize strategic dominance over collective benefits.
In the past few decades, Trump's positions have often rejected collaborative benefits, favoring a competitive stance instead. His administration's decisions reflect this zero-sum theory, especially noticeable in trade negotiations and international diplomacy, where the emphasis shifts toward securing unilateral advantages rather than mutual gains.
The implications of this transition are significant. As Trump's second term unfolds, it raises pertinent questions about the sustainability of longstanding international agreements and the future of relationships with allies. If the U.S. continues to adopt this zero-sum mentality, it risks undermining decades of diplomacy built on trust and reciprocity.
Ultimately, as global dynamics shift, understanding Trump's ideology and its ramifications will be essential for comprehending the evolving landscape of international relations through his unique lens.