Following an intense negotiation effort, Ukraine and the U.S. are on the brink of a deal to share mineral revenues. While this agreement highlights collaboration, it raises questions regarding the absence of direct military support amid ongoing aggression from Russia.
Ukraine and U.S. Near Agreement on Mineral Wealth Sharing Amid Conflict
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/316c1/316c1dd4396be2fc0388d675d4f6f5272f09f2db" alt=""
Ukraine and U.S. Near Agreement on Mineral Wealth Sharing Amid Conflict
Ukraine and the U.S. are finalizing a deal that could facilitate the sharing of natural resource revenues as President Trump pushes for more collaboration.
Ukraine and the United States are reportedly in the final stages of negotiating an agreement that would allow Washington to receive a share of Ukraine’s revenue from natural resources, according to both President Trump and a Ukrainian government official. The expected visit of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to the White House could potentially formalize the deal soon, with Trump stating, “The agreement’s being worked on now. They’re very close to a final deal.” Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister Olha Stefanishyna also indicated on social media that negotiations between Ukrainian and U.S. teams were advancing.
Despite this positive momentum, the terms of the proposed agreement suggest improvements for Ukraine compared to earlier drafts. However, it notably lacks the security guarantees that Ukrainian officials had been seeking amid their struggle against the Russian invasion. Four anonymous sources familiar with the negotiations reported that terms were still being negotiated as of Monday evening, indicating that changes could still occur before any finalization.
The discussions surrounding Ukraine's mineral wealth are closely intertwined with the broader context of U.S. military and financial support for Ukraine. Zelensky has expressed that any peace agreements must ensure the provision of Western arms to protect against future Russian aggression. Conversely, Trump maintains his stance that the war needs to conclude as swiftly as possible but has not presented offers of military support.
As these negotiations unfold, stakeholders are left questioning how the agreement will impact Ukraine’s security posture long-term, especially in light of the ongoing conflict with Russia, which appears far from resolution. The outcome might not only influence the balance of power in Eastern Europe but could also set the stage for future U.S.-Ukraine relations as they navigate a complex geopolitical landscape.
Despite this positive momentum, the terms of the proposed agreement suggest improvements for Ukraine compared to earlier drafts. However, it notably lacks the security guarantees that Ukrainian officials had been seeking amid their struggle against the Russian invasion. Four anonymous sources familiar with the negotiations reported that terms were still being negotiated as of Monday evening, indicating that changes could still occur before any finalization.
The discussions surrounding Ukraine's mineral wealth are closely intertwined with the broader context of U.S. military and financial support for Ukraine. Zelensky has expressed that any peace agreements must ensure the provision of Western arms to protect against future Russian aggression. Conversely, Trump maintains his stance that the war needs to conclude as swiftly as possible but has not presented offers of military support.
As these negotiations unfold, stakeholders are left questioning how the agreement will impact Ukraine’s security posture long-term, especially in light of the ongoing conflict with Russia, which appears far from resolution. The outcome might not only influence the balance of power in Eastern Europe but could also set the stage for future U.S.-Ukraine relations as they navigate a complex geopolitical landscape.