Skip to main content
Neutral Echo
CrimeUnited States (Las Vegas, Nevada)

Canadian tourist found guilty of stealing flamingo from Las Vegas hotel

A Canadian visitor was convicted of animal cruelty after he stole a flamingo from an enclosure at the Flamingo Las Vegas Hotel and Casino.

Source: bbc.co.uk1 min read
Canadian tourist found guilty of stealing flamingo from Las Vegas hotel
Image via bbc.co.uk

In brief

Mitchell Fairbarn, a 34‑year‑old Canadian, was found guilty of animal cruelty after taking a Chilean flamingo named Peachy from its habitat at the Flamingo Las Vegas Hotel in March. The trial revealed he had consumed an estimated 30 to 40 beers before the incident and swore it was a harmless prank. He faces almost five years in prison, while the bird has largely recovered but remains wary of humans. The case highlights the tensions between casual tourism, wildlife care, and legal repercussions.

Mitchell Fairbarn, 34, a Canadian tourist who was visiting Las Vegas, has been convicted of animal cruelty for stealing a Chilean flamingo from its enclosure at the Flamingo Las Vegas Hotel and Casino. The bird, named Peachy, was taken in March by Fairbarn after he reported consuming between thirty and forty beers before the incident, claiming he never intended to harm it.

Video evidence from the trial showed Fairbarn pulling the flamingo by its neck as he entered an elevator to his hotel room. Witnesses and animal experts testified that Peachy suffered torn feathers and blood loss during the abduction. A veterinarian for the state noted that, while the bird has largely recovered, it now displays increased anxiety around humans.

Faced with felony and misdemeanor charges of animal abuse, Fairbarn received a conviction after about five hours of jury deliberation. He is currently on house arrest and a sentencing hearing is scheduled for December.

The incident has sparked debate over the responsibilities of tourists in interacting with wildlife and the legal safeguards in place to protect animals in commercial venues. While Fairbarn’s lawyer attributes the act to drunken imprudence and describes it as a prank, prosecutors emphasize the seriousness of the offence, underscoring the broader issue of animal welfare in entertainment settings.

Topics

More on this story