Skip to main content
Neutral Echo
PoliticsA Virginia judge ruled that a proposed constitutional amendment allowing Democrats to redraw congressional maps was illegal, complicating their efforts to gain U.S. House seats. The ruling cited procedural failures in how the amendment was added and communicated. The ruling may be appealed as part of ongoing redistricting litigation across several states.

Virginia Judge Invalidates Redistricting Amendment, Impacting Congressional Map

A Virginia judge has ruled against a proposed constitutional amendment that would have allowed Democrats to redraw Congressional maps, potentially affecting their chances in the upcoming House elections. This decision aligns with ongoing redistricting battles across the nation.

Source: AP1 min read
Virginia Judge Invalidates Redistricting Amendment, Impacting Congressional Map
Image via AP

In brief

In a significant ruling, Tazewell Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley Jr. declared a proposed constitutional amendment, which would have enabled Democrats in Virginia to redraw Congressional district maps, as illegal. The judge cited multiple legal violations regarding the amendment's legislative process. The ruling is expected to be appealed by the proponents of the amendment, as the redistricting issue continues to be a contentious matter nationwide with implications for upcoming elections.

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — A Virginia judge ruled Tuesday that a proposed constitutional amendment letting Democrats redraw the state’s Congressional maps was illegal, potentially foiling their efforts to pick up seats in the U.S. House in November.Tazewell Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley Jr. struck down the legislature’s actions on three grounds, ruling that lawmakers failed to follow their own rules for adding the redistricting amendment to a special session; failed to approve the amendment before the public began voting in last year’s general election; and failed to publish the amendment three months before the election, as required by law.As a result, he said, the amendment was invalid and void.Virginians for Fair Elections, a campaign that supports the redistricting resolution, said in a statement that it expects an appeal.“Republicans court-shopped for a ruling because litigation and misinformation are the only tools they have left,” campaign manager Keren Charles Dongo said. “We’re prepared for what comes next, and Virginians deserve both the right to vote and the chance to level the playing field.”Across the country, the unusual mid-decade redistricting battle has resulted so far in nine more seats that Republicans believe they can win in Texas, Missouri, North Carolina and Ohio. Democrats, meanwhile, think they can win six more because of redistricting in California and Utah.Democrats hope to fully or partially make up that three-seat margin in Virginia.As in Virginia, redistricting is still being litigated in several states, and there is no guarantee that the parties will win the seats they have redrawn.

Topics

More on this story