Skip to main content
Neutral Echo
PoliticsSichuan Province, China; United States

U.S. Zoo Funding for Panda Conservation: Investigation Reveals Misuse of Millions

An investigation uncovers how U.S. zoos funded panda conservation in China, while funds were diverted for unrelated expenses.

By Mara HvistendahlSource: nytimes.com1 min read
U.S. Zoo Funding for Panda Conservation: Investigation Reveals Misuse of Millions
Image via nytimes.com

In brief

An extensive investigation has revealed that U.S. zoos have donated significant sums for panda conservation, yet much of the money went towards unrelated projects in China. Zoo administrators maintained the funding despite knowing some went misallocated, fearing a loss of access to the iconic bears.

For decades, American zoos have allocated tens of millions of dollars to support panda conservation efforts in China, primarily for the privilege of hosting these beloved animals. However, a recent Times investigation has unveiled discrepancies in how that funding was utilized, revealing that instead of being exclusively used for conservation, substantial sums were diverted to fund apartment buildings, roads, and various non-conservation related infrastructures.Documents reviewed during the investigation indicate that the Chinese government has not provided satisfactory accountability for millions more allocated for conservation, prompting long-standing concerns from regulators at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This federal body oversees the payments to ensure compliance with U.S. laws that mandate the funds be directed toward protecting the species in the wild.Despite ongoing warnings from U.S. regulators, American zoos continued to funnel money, driven by their dependence on the public's attraction to pandas. In fact, there was reluctance amongst zoo officials to scrutinize the spending too intensely, as they feared that any potential backlash could jeopardize their ability to display pandas, thereby impacting visitor numbers and revenue streams.Historically, the U.S. government has acted to freeze payments to China on three occasions when record-keeping issues emerged, yet those payments resumed after negotiations. Kenneth Stansell, a former official of the Fish and Wildlife Service who visited China to discuss panda management, noted that Chinese representatives argued that the U.S. should not involve itself in how funds were utilized. This scenario poses critical questions about the efficacy of international conservation financing and the necessity for stringent oversight of these funds to ensure they are benefiting the wildlife they aim to protect.

Topics

More on this story