A recent report published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology suggests that the traditional definition of obesity based solely on Body Mass Index (BMI) is outdated and calls for a more nuanced approach to diagnosing obesity in individuals.
**Global Experts Call for New Definition of Obesity to Improve Patient Care**
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92018/92018c06245ded8966d24efad7d6163ab70973ce" alt=""
**Global Experts Call for New Definition of Obesity to Improve Patient Care**
A comprehensive report advocates redefining obesity to account for overall health, beyond just BMI measurements.
The article text below outlines key recommendations and considerations from the expert group collaborating on this innovative approach.
The report asserts that a significant numbers of individuals may be misclassified as obese due to their BMI without proper context of their overall health. It emphasizes that medical professionals should consider the health status of patients presenting with excess body fat, rather than relying predominantly on BMI. The report proposes categorizing patients into two new classifications: "clinical obesity," for those with chronic health conditions related to their weight, and "pre-clinical obesity," for those without any significant health issues.
According to the report, over a billion individuals globally are currently living with obesity, and there is an increasing demand for weight-loss medications. Prof. Francesco Rubino, the chair of the expert group from King's College London, noted, "Obesity is a spectrum," emphasizing that while some individuals manage their weight and maintain a normal lifestyle, others face substantial health challenges.
Currently, in many countries, defining obesity relies heavily on BMI, with a standard threshold set at a BMI of over 30. However, critics argue that BMI is an inadequate measure as it does not account for muscle mass, or the potentially hazardous fat distribution in the body, particularly around the waist and internal organs. The new report advocates for using alternative assessments, such as waist-height ratios and direct fat measurements, to provide a clearer understanding of an individual’s health concerning obesity.
The experts highlighted that individuals with "pre-clinical obesity" should not immediately be subjected to drugs or surgical interventions. Instead, they should receive weight-management support that could include counseling and monitoring. This shift is intended to prevent the onset of potential health issues rather than reactively treating established conditions.
Prof. Rubino mentioned that recognizing obesity as both a health risk and a clinical disease is crucial for enhancing treatment strategies. He underscored the importance of refining the approach, as a more precise classification could help reduce the number of patients receiving unnecessary treatments and ensure appropriate care for those already facing severe obesity-related health consequences.
The Royal College of Physicians commended the report for establishing a robust groundwork to approach obesity with the sensitivity and seriousness it demands. Nonetheless, concerns have been raised regarding the allocation of resources, with some experts warning that funding may become predominantly focused on clinically obese patients, potentially neglecting those categorized with pre-clinical obesity.
As the landscape of obesity treatment continues to evolve, this proposed reframing of the condition is more relevant than ever, promising improved accuracy in diagnoses and patient care.
The report asserts that a significant numbers of individuals may be misclassified as obese due to their BMI without proper context of their overall health. It emphasizes that medical professionals should consider the health status of patients presenting with excess body fat, rather than relying predominantly on BMI. The report proposes categorizing patients into two new classifications: "clinical obesity," for those with chronic health conditions related to their weight, and "pre-clinical obesity," for those without any significant health issues.
According to the report, over a billion individuals globally are currently living with obesity, and there is an increasing demand for weight-loss medications. Prof. Francesco Rubino, the chair of the expert group from King's College London, noted, "Obesity is a spectrum," emphasizing that while some individuals manage their weight and maintain a normal lifestyle, others face substantial health challenges.
Currently, in many countries, defining obesity relies heavily on BMI, with a standard threshold set at a BMI of over 30. However, critics argue that BMI is an inadequate measure as it does not account for muscle mass, or the potentially hazardous fat distribution in the body, particularly around the waist and internal organs. The new report advocates for using alternative assessments, such as waist-height ratios and direct fat measurements, to provide a clearer understanding of an individual’s health concerning obesity.
The experts highlighted that individuals with "pre-clinical obesity" should not immediately be subjected to drugs or surgical interventions. Instead, they should receive weight-management support that could include counseling and monitoring. This shift is intended to prevent the onset of potential health issues rather than reactively treating established conditions.
Prof. Rubino mentioned that recognizing obesity as both a health risk and a clinical disease is crucial for enhancing treatment strategies. He underscored the importance of refining the approach, as a more precise classification could help reduce the number of patients receiving unnecessary treatments and ensure appropriate care for those already facing severe obesity-related health consequences.
The Royal College of Physicians commended the report for establishing a robust groundwork to approach obesity with the sensitivity and seriousness it demands. Nonetheless, concerns have been raised regarding the allocation of resources, with some experts warning that funding may become predominantly focused on clinically obese patients, potentially neglecting those categorized with pre-clinical obesity.
As the landscape of obesity treatment continues to evolve, this proposed reframing of the condition is more relevant than ever, promising improved accuracy in diagnoses and patient care.