Following her heckling of King Charles, Australian Senator Lidia Thorpe faced censure from lawmakers who condemned her actions as disrespectful. While the Senate's vote highlighted political disapproval, it also sparked discussions about the ongoing struggles of Indigenous Australians and the need for treaties that acknowledge historical injustices.
Debate Surrounds Australian Senator's Censure for Heckling King Charles
Debate Surrounds Australian Senator's Censure for Heckling King Charles
Senator Lidia Thorpe's protest against King Charles during his visit to Australia reveals deep divisions over colonial history and Indigenous sovereignty.
Australian Senator Lidia Thorpe has garnered significant attention after being censured by her peers for heckling King Charles during his recent visit to Canberra. The Australian Senate, in a vote of 46-12, expressed "profound disapproval" towards Thorpe's actions, which she undertook to draw attention to the impacts of British colonization on Indigenous peoples. During the King's address in the Great Hall of Parliament, Thorpe shouted phrases such as "you are not my King" and "this is not your land," aiming to illustrate the historical grievances stemming from colonization.
The Senate's condemnation, while symbolically powerful, lacked any legal implications, and the censure motion specifically stated that such behavior should disqualify her from representing the chamber on any forthcoming delegations. Immediately following the vote, Thorpe informed the media that she had been unable to voice her perspective in the chamber due to a flight delay. In her statement, she emphasized the historical injustices perpetrated by the British Crown against Aboriginal people, reaffirming her commitment to advocating for their rights.
The reaction to Thorpe’s protest was mixed; it garnered criticism from across the political spectrum as well as from some Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders, while simultaneously receiving support from activists who viewed it as a necessary highlighting of Indigenous struggles and ongoing disadvantages in health, wealth, and education.
Thorpe is renowned for her Indigenous activism, advocating for a treaty between Australia’s government and its first inhabitants—a subject that remains contentious in a country where such accords have historically not occurred. In contrast to New Zealand and other former British territories, no formal treaty has been established with Australia's Indigenous populations, who assert that they never relinquished their sovereignty to the Crown.
Despite the protest, King Charles received a warm reception from Australian crowds during his five-day stay, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese acknowledging the importance of the royal visit amid ongoing discussions about Australia’s constitutional future and its relationship with the monarchy.
Thorpe's activism has previously made headlines, especially during her 2022 swearing-in ceremony when she labeled Queen Elizabeth II as a colonizer, a statement that prompted her to repeat her oath. Additionally, last year, a referendum aimed at granting constitutional recognition to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples was decisively rejected, despite a majority of those communities voting in favor. This dynamic has further complicated Australia's political landscape, placing Indigenous rights at the forefront of national debate.