In a recent move that echoes a long-held conservative ambition, President Trump has signed an executive order aimed at dismantling the U.S. Department of Education, according to various sources. Trump emphasized the need for this action during a signing ceremony, asserting that the current education system is failing, as students have low performance rankings despite high spending levels. While this initiative has garnered significant support from conservative factions, it faces significant obstacles, including legal challenges and the requirement for Congressional approval to completely close the department.
Dismantling the Department of Education: Trump Signs Executive Order

Dismantling the Department of Education: Trump Signs Executive Order
US President Donald Trump takes steps to dismantle the Education Department, facing legal hurdles and Congressional challenges.
Trump reiterated his commitment to education reform, stating, "We're going to shut it down as quickly as possible." He appointed Linda McMahon to lead the department, suggesting she would be the last person to hold that title. However, achieving the full disbandment of the department would be a monumental task, as it requires a supermajority vote in Congress, a feat deemed highly improbable given the current political landscape. The Republican majority in the Senate is slim, and substantial bipartisan support for such a contentious issue is likely difficult to attain.
The executive order aims to reduce the Department of Education's influence by devolving powers to state and local governments. Critics have expressed concerns that Trump's actions may dismantle crucial educational support systems, especially for low-income students, and disrupt federal student loan programs that millions depend on. Notably, federal funding constitutes a small proportion of overall education financing—about 13%—with most funding stemming from local and state sources.
Education unions have openly criticized Trump's approach, arguing it could harm marginalized students by prioritizing a "war on woke" ideals at the expense of educational equity. The American Federation of Teachers stated, "No one likes bureaucracy... But don't use a 'war on woke' to attack the children living in poverty."
Meanwhile, McMahon rallied her 4,400 employees in a supportive memo called "Our Department's Final Mission," attempting to reframe the dismantlement as an opportunity to strengthen future generations' education. The Department of Education has existed since 1979, and advocates for educational support have historically defended its role in protecting student interests.
As the Trump administration looks to push forward with ambitious budget cuts and agency reforms, consequences for education funding and policy direction remain uncertain. Amid ongoing discussions, the department's future hangs in the balance, reflecting deep divisions in American educational priorities and political ideals.
The executive order aims to reduce the Department of Education's influence by devolving powers to state and local governments. Critics have expressed concerns that Trump's actions may dismantle crucial educational support systems, especially for low-income students, and disrupt federal student loan programs that millions depend on. Notably, federal funding constitutes a small proportion of overall education financing—about 13%—with most funding stemming from local and state sources.
Education unions have openly criticized Trump's approach, arguing it could harm marginalized students by prioritizing a "war on woke" ideals at the expense of educational equity. The American Federation of Teachers stated, "No one likes bureaucracy... But don't use a 'war on woke' to attack the children living in poverty."
Meanwhile, McMahon rallied her 4,400 employees in a supportive memo called "Our Department's Final Mission," attempting to reframe the dismantlement as an opportunity to strengthen future generations' education. The Department of Education has existed since 1979, and advocates for educational support have historically defended its role in protecting student interests.
As the Trump administration looks to push forward with ambitious budget cuts and agency reforms, consequences for education funding and policy direction remain uncertain. Amid ongoing discussions, the department's future hangs in the balance, reflecting deep divisions in American educational priorities and political ideals.