The New Zealand parliament has voted down the Treaty Principles Bill, which sought to legally define the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, amidst significant public protest and political opposition. The 112 to 11 vote reflects the consensus among political parties and the concerns raised by over 300,000 submissions, predominantly against the bill, highlighting the ongoing dialogue around Māori rights and historical redress.
New Zealand's Treaty Principles Bill Fails Amidst Major Public Backlash

New Zealand's Treaty Principles Bill Fails Amidst Major Public Backlash
The proposed Treaty Principles Bill, aimed at redefining the foundational rights of Māori and non-Māori, has been overwhelmingly rejected by New Zealand's parliament following extensive protests and public disapproval.
The proposed Treaty Principles Bill, which aimed to reinterpret New Zealand's foundational Treaty of Waitangi, was recently defeated in Parliament with a significant 112 to 11 vote. This legislative attempt, which sought to legally formalize the principles from the Treaty established in 1840 and clarified the rights for both Māori and non-Māori citizens, faced substantial backlash, spurring protests with involvement from over 40,000 people last year outside of Parliament.
An instigator for the bill’s failure was a report from a government committee just days prior, recommending against its progression. With widespread foresight that the legislation would not succeed, nearly all major political factions unified in their opposition. Members from the right-leaning Act Party, which introduced the bill, were the only ones to advocate for it during the second reading. David Seymour, the party leader, expressed intentions to persistently campaign for the principles embodied in the Treaty to be recognized in law, regardless of the bill's outcomes.
Tensions among parliamentarians were palpable during the pre-vote debates, most notably arising from a heated confrontation where Labour MP Willie Jackson was asked to exit for calling Seymour a "liar." Labour leader Chris Hipkins condemned the legislation, labeling it as potentially patronizing to the nation’s values, while Te Pāti Māori's MP Hana Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke characterized the bill’s defeat as a unifying moment for various communities across New Zealand, contrary to its divisive intent.
The select committee, tasked with evaluating the bill, revealed an unprecedented number of more than 300,000 submissions, primarily reflecting strong opposition, underscoring a historic engagement with Parliament regarding proposed legislation. Even though the principles of the Treaty have not been legally defined thus far, they have been integrated into various laws aimed at addressing grievances stemming from historical injustices during colonization.
The Act Party’s proposed legislation encompassed three primary provisions: affirming governmental authority and legislative powers; safeguarding Māori rights recognized at the time of the Treaty; and guaranteeing equality under the law for everyone. Supporters have claimed that formalizing these principles would bolster equity and enhance social cohesion across New Zealand. However, critics highlight potential adverse effects on Māori communities and societal unity, suggesting that the bill would exacerbate existing disparities.
Sharon Hawke, representing Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei hapū, articulated fears that the bill could erode the progress made in equity for Māori citizens, stating it tarnished aspirations for a unified future. Concerns were also raised regarding the bill’s compatibility with international law and potential repercussions for New Zealand’s global standing.
While some voices in favor of the bill cited a need for clarity around Treaty principles, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon indicated a lack of personal support for the legislation, emphasizing a desire to move on from contentious debates. As discussions continue about the Treaty and its implications, the long-term dialogue surrounding Māori rights remains a significant aspect of New Zealand's political landscape.