A recent ruling by the European Court of Human Rights has attributed responsibility to Russia for the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 in 2014, alongside a series of significant human rights violations stemming from its military actions in Ukraine. This decision, while largely symbolic, emphasizes Moscow's growing international isolation due to its aggressive stance in the region.
European Court Declares Russia Liable for Human Rights Violations Amid Ukraine Conflict

European Court Declares Russia Liable for Human Rights Violations Amid Ukraine Conflict
Court findings underline Russia's culpability in the 2014 MH17 disaster and war-related abuses in Ukraine.
The court's ruling addressed four cases, including the tragic incident of MH17, which was shot down over separatist-held territories in Eastern Ukraine, resulting in the deaths of 298 individuals, primarily Dutch citizens. Following additional investigations, including a ruling from a Dutch court, it was established that a Buk missile system provided by the Russian military led to the aircraft's downfall. The European Court confirmed that the missile was presumably fired by either Russian military personnel or local separatists, underlining Russia’s control over the situation.
The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs welcomed the court's unanimous verdict as a crucial advancement toward achieving justice for the victims and their families. As the legal consequences of Russia’s military engagement in Ukraine continue to unfold, this ruling may serve as a reminder of the accountability mechanisms available in international law despite the challenges in enforcing such judgments against a state like Russia.
The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs welcomed the court's unanimous verdict as a crucial advancement toward achieving justice for the victims and their families. As the legal consequences of Russia’s military engagement in Ukraine continue to unfold, this ruling may serve as a reminder of the accountability mechanisms available in international law despite the challenges in enforcing such judgments against a state like Russia.