In an unusual move, President Donald Trump has publicly demanded the resignation of Intel's CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, citing his alleged connections with Chinese military-affiliated companies. Tan, a seasoned venture capitalist appointed to guide Intel through a challenging period, faces scrutiny not only from Trump but also from political figures concerned about national security. Intel's response emphasizes its commitment to U.S. interests amid growing tensions surrounding foreign investments and technology.
Trump Demands Intel CEO Resignation Over Alleged China Ties

Trump Demands Intel CEO Resignation Over Alleged China Ties
Trump's call for Intel chief Tan to step down reveals tensions in US-China relations and corporate governance.
In a recent social media post, President Trump called for the immediate resignation of Intel's CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, alleging that the executive has problematic ties to China. Trump described Tan as "highly conflicted," seemingly referencing his investments in firms reportedly related to the Chinese military. This public demand for a corporate executive's resignation is notably unusual for a sitting president.
Tan was appointed in March with the aim of revitalizing the American semiconductor giant, which has historically led the industry but recently lagged behind its competitors. Intel has received substantial government funds as part of initiatives to strengthen U.S. semiconductor manufacturing capabilities.
In response to Trump's remarks, Intel defended Tan, stating their dedication to U.S. economic and national security. The company's press release emphasized its alignment with Trump's "America First" policy, indicating that both the board and Tan remain focused on advancing U.S. interests.
Tan, a naturalized U.S. citizen originally from Malaysia, has a strong background in the semiconductor sector. In a recent update, he mentioned scaling down investments, including in the U.S., to align with consumer demand. This strategy follows significant job cuts within Intel as part of a restructuring plan. Following Trump's attack, Intel's shares dropped over 3%.
Trump's criticisms of Tan echo concerns raised by Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who has questioned the CEO's capability to manage taxpayer funds responsibly in light of his past associations with companies that have violated U.S. export regulations. Recently, Cadence Design Systems, where Tan previously served as CEO, pleaded guilty to such transgressions.
Despite Trump's strong stance, experts suggest that the former president may be leveraging Tan’s alleged connections to increase pressure on Intel regarding other business negotiations, potentially related to partnerships with Taiwanese manufacturers. Strategist Patrick Moorhead noted that Trump's approach to public criticism is unique, and other tech leaders who have come under scrutiny have offered promises that align more closely with the White House's priorities.
In response to accusations of overstepping, a White House official reiterated Trump's commitment to ensuring that critical sectors are led by trustworthy individuals. Tan's alleged investments in over 200 Chinese companies, some tied to the military, have been scrutinized in congressional reports and media investigations, compounding concerns over U.S.-China relations.
Republican Senator Bernie Moreno also joined the criticism of Tan, focusing on delays in Intel's U.S. manufacturing initiatives. Market analysts indicate that this turmoil could complicate Intel's efforts to expand its chip production capabilities at a time when enhancing domestic semiconductor manufacturing is vital for U.S. economic resilience.
As the situation unfolds, the implications for both Intel and broader U.S. semiconductor policy remain to be seen. "Intel's leadership stability is crucial for fostering growth in chip manufacturing and addressing current challenges," noted Janet Egan, emphasizing the need for consistent leadership during this critical period.