South Korea has legalised tattoo artistry by non-medical professionals for the first time in more than 30 years, following a campaign by members of the profession to work without fear of prosecution or harassment.
Though tattoos are commonplace in the east Asian nation, offering them has been limited to medical professionals following a 1992 Supreme Court ruling.
But, after the passing of the Tattooist Act by the General Assembly on Thursday, non-medical professionals - who compose most of the industry - will be able to obtain a licence.
Lim Bo-ran, president of the Korea Tattoo Federation, cried at the law's passing, saying: I can't speak because it feels like a dream. I am truly grateful. The previous legal structure had forced anyone offering tattoos to do so at the risk of imprisonment for up to five years or hefty fines.
Statistical insight shows that between 1992 and now, the Tattoo Union offers legal support to at least 50 artists annually who face legal action, indicating a substantial unreported issue surrounding the practice. By 2021, there were approximately 350,000 tattoo artists in South Korea, largely untrained in medical fields, with many coming from art or beauty backgrounds.
The cultural landscape around tattoos in South Korea is shifting. Recent court acquittals of some tattoo artists signal a change in attitudes. Support for the new law has also stemmed from leaders within the National Assembly who recognize the safe need for professional tattooing services, especially in light of increasing popularity among younger generations.
However, resistance remains strong. The Korean Medical Association argues that tattooing poses medical risks and should not be permitted outside of health care settings. Additionally, societal stigma persists, suggesting that while legal progress is notable, the social acceptance of tattoos may take longer to achieve.
The newly established law will take effect in two years, contingent upon artists passing national exams and undertaking professional safety training. Tattoo removals, however, will still require medical practitioners.
