Guterres emphasizes the inevitability of the clean energy shift and faults the US for hampering progress and missing out economically.
**UN Chief: US Missing Major Economic Opportunity in Renewable Energy Transition**

**UN Chief: US Missing Major Economic Opportunity in Renewable Energy Transition**
António Guterres highlights the economic benefits of transitioning to renewable energy while criticizing US fossil fuel policies.
In a prominent address at the United Nations headquarters, Secretary-General António Guterres articulated a hopeful message regarding the global transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy. Speaking on the crucial need for renewable energy solutions, he stated that economic data indicates this shift is not only possible but also "unstoppable." However, Guterres directed attention to the United States, criticizing the country's withdrawal from pivotal climate agreements under former President Trump.
He underscored that the US's current policies are detrimental to both environmental progress and economic potential, alleging that they favor fossil fuel industries with substantial subsidies—nine times greater than those received by renewable energies. He warned that these actions, in collaboration with similar stances taken by other nations, are causing significant economic disruption and leading to missed opportunities for growth within the clean energy sector.
Even while acknowledging the formidable barrier these policies present, Guterres expressed renewed confidence in the global transition to cleaner technologies. He deemed the current moment as one where energy choices can be reshaped by advancing technology and evolving geopolitical landscapes. His message was clear: "Follow the money," he urged, insisting that economic motivation will eventually lead to a sustainable energy future, despite present challenges posed by government decisions and market distortions.
Guterres's speech has sparked discussions on the need for re-evaluating energy strategies in light of emerging technologies and has been met with varied opinions, reflecting both support and skepticism regarding the pace of change in the energy market and the role of political leadership in shaping it.