Federal Judge Halts Layoffs Amid Ongoing Government Shutdown

Thu Oct 16 2025 01:29:06 GMT+0300 (Eastern European Summer Time)

A federal court has ordered the Trump administration to refrain from terminating federal workers during the government shutdown, claiming the layoffs serve as political pressure. The ruling has implications for unions advocating for workers' rights.

In a significant ruling, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston has ordered the Trump administration to cease layoffs of federal employees during the ongoing government shutdown. This decision arises amidst reports that the administration issued layoff notices as a means to exert political pressure on Democratic lawmakers. The American Federation of Government Employees and other labor unions argued that the layoff notices were an abuse of power reflecting poorly on the administration's approach. With the government shutdown entering its third week, Democratic lawmakers demand to address health care concerns before reopening.

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — In a landmark ruling, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston has ordered President Donald Trump's administration to halt the termination of federal workers amid the ongoing government shutdown. This emergency order comes in response to reports that federal agencies began issuing layoff notices as a strategy to reduce the federal workforce and to pressure Democratic lawmakers during the funding impasse.

Judge Illston criticized the administration’s approach, stating that it has not fully considered the human impact of these decisions. It's very much ready, fire, aim on most of these programs, and it has a human cost that cannot be tolerated, she remarked.

The American Federation of Government Employees and several labor unions sought a temporary restraining order to block these layoffs, arguing that the notices constituted an abuse of power designed to intimidate and coerce federal workers and Congress alike. With over 4,100 job cuts planned across various federal agencies, concerns about the implications for government services and worker welfare continue to rise.

This court ruling arrives at a time when the shutdown has extended into its third week, with significant divisions remaining between Republican and Democratic lawmakers. House Speaker Mike Johnson has warned that this could become the longest shutdown in U.S. history. He refuses to negotiate with Democrats until they agree to pause their demands related to healthcare and other funding issues.

Throughout this shutdown, the Trump administration has been prioritizing military pay and advancing its immigration policies while pushing cuts in health and education programs, including critical areas such as special education. Trump has justified the layoffs as targeting programs favored by Democrats, suggesting these cuts may not be restored.

The unions have reiterated that the layoffs are an illegal attempt to conduct political bargaining and unjustly leverage the funding lapse to eliminate authorized federal programs. The administration counters that the court lacks jurisdiction to contest employment decisions from federal agencies, emphasizing their legal authority during such shutdowns.

As advocates for workers’ rights continue to rally, the debate over the legality and ethics of these layoffs adds another layer to the complex dynamics of the ongoing government shutdown. An official follow-up can be found through the AP's extensive coverage of the federal government shutdown.