MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Since its establishment in 2018, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has played a crucial role in alerting state and local election officials to potential threats from foreign governments, demonstrating strategies for safeguarding polling places, and planning responses to unexpected incidents like bomb threats or disinformation campaigns.
However, during recent elections in several states, CISA's presence was notably absent. Concerns are growing among election officials regarding the agency's level of support for the approaching 2026 midterms, especially in light of staffing reductions and budget cuts instituted by the Trump administration.
As Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon stated, We do not have a sense of whether we can rely on CISA for these services as we approach a big election year in 2026. The lack of clarity has prompted officials to seek ways to fill anticipated gaps that may result from CISA's reduced functionality.
The concerns are echoed by other officials, who have noticed a significant decrease in CISA's capacity to support elections. For instance, California's top election security agencies indicated that while CISA has historically been critical, its current support appears significantly diminished, leaving states to operate primarily on their own.
Fundamental functions of CISA, including the coordination of security scenarios and conducting exercises to prepare for various election threats, are in flux. With the agency undergoing organizational changes and currently lacking a permanent director, states may need to devise alternative plans rather than depend solely on federal resources.
As focus shifts towards the 2026 midterms, election officials stress the importance of timely information about CISA's capabilities or any potential changes in support, as various states are already feeling compelled to act independently to ensure smooth electoral processes.
