Meta and Google Found Liable in Groundbreaking Social Media Addiction Case
A Los Angeles jury has handed down an unprecedented win for a young woman who sued Meta and Google over her childhood addiction to social media. The panel found that Meta and Google intentionally built addictive social media platforms that harmed the mental health of a 20-year-old woman, known as Kaley.
The result will likely influence hundreds of similar cases now winding their way through the US courts. Lawyers for Meta argued that while Kaley had suffered in her life, her use of Instagram - which Meta owns along with Facebook and WhatsApp - did not cause or meaningfully contribute to those struggles.
After a trial that lasted about five weeks, jurors found Meta to be 70% responsible for the plaintiff's harm, while YouTube was found to be 30% to blame. In a statement, Meta said: We respectfully disagree with the verdict and are evaluating our legal options.
During his first-ever appearance before a jury in February, Meta's chairman and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, relied on his company's longstanding policy of not allowing users under the age of 13 on any of its platforms. However, when presented with internal research showing that Meta knew young children were using its platforms, he stated he always wished for faster progress to identify users under 13.
While Google, as the owner of YouTube, was also a defendant in the case, most of the trial proceedings focused on Instagram and Meta. Snap and TikTok were initially defendants but reached undisclosed settlements with Kaley prior to the trial.
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
