In brief
U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman confirmed that the trial of Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan will proceed as scheduled on December 11. Dugan is charged with obstruction and concealing an immigrant in a case that has highlighted conflicts between local judicial discretion and federal immigration enforcement. Discussions regarding a potential plea deal have stalled, and the defense plans to contest the charges vigorously, asserting the judge’s innocence.
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A federal judge said Wednesday that the trial for a Wisconsin judge charged with illegally aiding an immigrant to avoid federal agents will move forward next month, despite speculation about a potential plea deal.
U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman informed parties involved in the case that they should prepare for the trial to start on December 11, including the selection of a jury.
Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan faces charges filed in April for obstruction and concealment of an individual to prevent federal arrest. Dugan was scheduled to preside over a state battery case against Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, a 31-year-old undocumented immigrant. Federal agents arrived at the Milwaukee County Courthouse to apprehend Flores-Ruiz, but Dugan reportedly learned of their presence and ushered him out through a private exit. Though Flores-Ruiz managed to evade initial capture, he was ultimately apprehended, leading to his deportation.
If convicted on both charges, Dugan could face a maximum of six years in prison. Prosecutors have suggested that plea discussions were ongoing, but Dugan has expressed disinterest in negotiating a deal.
Dugan's defense team maintains her innocence, emphasizing that her actions were in line with her judicial responsibilities. Attorney Steven Biskupic pointed out that they have already eliminated 34 potential jurors based on their responses to a preliminary questionnaire regarding biases.
The tension surrounding the case has heightened the ongoing friction between President Trump’s administration and local authorities, particularly concerning the administration’s strict immigration policies. Critics, including Democrats, claim that the government is attempting to intimidate judicial opposition by prosecuting Dugan.
Prosecutors indicated that they intend to call between 25 to 28 witnesses during the trial and will present recorded evidence from Dugan's courtroom. The government’s case is expected to last at least four days, although specific details about Dugan's defense strategy remain undisclosed.
As this legal battle unfolds, Dugan's indictment underscores broader issues surrounding immigration enforcement, judicial independence, and the courts' role in contested legal proceedings.
