Kenya is facing a fierce debate over its latest alcohol control proposals presented by the National Authority for the Campaign Against Alcohol and Drug Abuse (Nacada). The ambitious draft policies, made public on Wednesday, include significant restrictions on alcohol sales, such as raising the legal drinking age from 18 to 21, and limiting purchasing options exclusively to licensed pubs, bars, and specialty alcohol shops. The new regulations would prohibit sales in supermarkets, restaurants, public transport, and online platforms.
Government officials assert that these measures are crucial to combat rising substance abuse, particularly among the youth, citing troubling statistics that show one in every 20 Kenyans aged between 15 and 65 struggles with alcohol addiction. However, this initiative has not been without backlash. Many Kenyans and representatives of the alcohol industry have described the proposed restrictions as ill-conceived, claiming they threaten the livelihoods of workers in the sector and could lead to increased illicit trade in alcohol.
Nacada responded to the criticisms by clarifying that the draft is a "road map" and not an enforceable law, promising a thorough review process for any proposal that would require legal implementation. Industry voices, including the Alcoholic Beverage Association of Kenya (Abak), condemned the lack of prior consultation with manufacturers, branding the approach as exclusionary and unrealistic.
Notable figures have also voiced their concerns. Prominent lawyer Donald Kipkorir criticized the potential ban on alcohol sales in various venues, highlighting its detrimental impact on the hospitality and tourism sectors, which rely heavily on the availability of alcoholic beverages. The tension surrounding the issue recalls earlier failed attempts to combat alcohol abuse, such as the proposal by the country's former Deputy President for limiting pub licenses, which faced similar pushback.
As Kenya grapples with the complexities of alcohol consumption and abuse, the debate continues over how best to balance public health concerns with economic realities.




















