Jurisdiction Debate in Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court: A Case Analysis
January 16, 2026 | Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court 9.00 AM AGT
Justice Rene Williams presiding
In a significant hearing held at the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court, Justice Rene Williams addressed complex jurisdictional challenges in a high-profile case involving Mr. David and an alleged media legal cartel on January 16, 2026. Justice Williams maintained the court's authority despite parallel foreign proceedings in California and London, which further complicated the legal landscape.
During the proceedings, the court sought further clarification concerning recent written submissions from both the Attorney General’s office and Mr. David. Justice Williams highlighted her limited review of Mr. David's latest submissions, which emphasized service receipts, a note addressing comity between jurisdictions, and the re-filing of previously submitted documents.
The Attorney General's representatives argued that the court lacked jurisdiction, referencing the residency of most defendants outside Antigua & Barbuda and disputing any clear governing of the claims by Antiguan law. They presented concerns about practical difficulties and insufficient connections to the local jurisdiction.
Responding to these claims, Mr. David contended that the harm extended into Antigua and Barbuda. He cited the presence of the Alpha Nero yacht within Antiguan waters as evidence and argued that the claimed misconduct significantly impacted local interests. He positioned Antigua as the anchor jurisdiction, asserting it is the only court unaffected by alleged misconduct in parallel proceedings.
A noteworthy twist arose when Justice Williams disclosed receiving a letter from Howard Kennedy LLP, a UK law firm, which challenged the court's jurisdiction and indicated non-participation in the hearing. Mr. David claimed the firm’s refusal amounted to contempt and noted their prior awareness of the case.
Justice Williams indicated that while she would consider the implications and responses carefully, she also expressed concerns regarding potential conflicting rulings across jurisdictions. The court ultimately decided to issue a written ruling on jurisdiction early next month, illustrating the intricate balance between local authority and international law challenges.
The hearing concluded with Justice Williams emphasizing the necessity of thorough consideration of the materials presented. The anticipated ruling is expected to clarify jurisdictional parameters that could shape the outcomes of this and potentially other similar cases.
