In brief
In a phone interview with Axios, President Donald Trump said the United States will act against Iran but is not in a hurry to decide on further strikes. The remarks echo similar reports from the Times of Israel, NTD Television, and NDTV, all of which note economic pressure on Tehran and ongoing diplomatic efforts. Meanwhile, local reports document limited U.S. strikes and Iranian defensive responses.
On Monday, U.S. President Donald Trump announced that he felt no urgency to decide whether to resume military action against Iran, stating he could wait to respond to Tehran’s actions while maintaining a firm stance.
According to Xinhua, Trump discussed the matter in a phone interview with the news website Axios, saying, "One way or the other, we will do something, but there is no rush. We crippled them financially. They have no money, no gasoline and their people are getting very tired of it."
In a separate interview reported by the Times of Israel, Trump told Channel 12 that U.S. economic pressure was weakening Tehran and that the administration was not in a hurry to resume the conflict, while indicating that diplomatic options were still being explored.
NTD Television also covered Trump’s remarks, noting that he emphasized the importance of keeping options open and that the administration remains focused on diplomatic relief despite the financial strain imposed on Iran.
NDTV’s report, which cites an additional comment from Trump, echoes this stance, saying he stressed the need for patience and that armed action would be taken only when deemed necessary, even as diplomatic efforts are pursued. The outlet noted that the President was far from endorsing a swift military escalation.
Meanwhile, analysts point to Iran’s dwindling fuel supply and economic disruptions, a situation highlighted by Trump, suggesting that the regime is facing logistical challenges that could influence the U.S. decision‑making process. The President’s comments underscore the tension between the economic warfare and potential military escalation.
International observers reacting to the U.S. comments varied: Some Israeli officials welcomed the restraint as a potential pathway to negotiation, while Iranian officials condemned the remarks as a threat of renewed hostilities. The diplomatic landscape remains fluid as the U.S. assesses the balance between pressure and possibility of engagement.
In sum, Trump’s statement signals a deliberate pacing in U.S. policy toward Iran, with an emphasis on maintaining pressure while keeping dialogue channels available, a position that echoes the differing accounts reported by major international outlets.
