Who Gets the Credit for Bashar al-Assad’s Fall? Perspectives from Washington and Jerusalem
A clash of narratives emerges as U.S. and Israeli leaders debate their roles in the ouster of Syria's leader.
As Bashar al-Assad finds refuge in Russia, conflicting accounts of responsibility for his removal highlight the complexities surrounding the end of his regime. President Biden claims U.S. efforts to undermine Assad's allies laid crucial groundwork for his ousting, pointing to the strategic weakening of Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia. Conversely, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu contends that the decisive blow came from Israel's elimination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, asserting that adherence to American caution could have postponed Assad’s downfall. This divergent interpretation not only showcases the varying perspectives but also hints at the intricate interplay of international relations that shaped the Syrian conflict.
In light of the historical narrative, the motivations and actions of the Syrian rebels and external support, particularly from Turkey, also warrant consideration. The debate over credit for Assad’s fall underscores the larger geopolitical dynamics at play and serves as a reminder of the ramifications of foreign intervention in regional conflicts.
As the political discourse continues, historians are likely to analyze the multitude of factors influencing this significant moment in Middle Eastern history for many years ahead.
