TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — In an unprecedented act of legal oversight during wartime, the Israeli Supreme Court ruled on Sunday that the Israeli government has failed to provide even a minimum subsistence diet to Palestinian detainees. The court has ordered authorities to enhance the quantity and quality of food offered to Palestinian prisoners, marking a significant shift in judicial accountability since the onset of hostilities in the 23-month Israel-Hamas conflict.
The court's decision comes in the wake of an escalation in violence after Hamas launched an attack on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 individuals, primarily civilians, which prompted Israel to adopt stringent measures against suspected militants across Gaza and the West Bank. As a result, many Palestinians have been detained under harsh conditions characterized by overcrowding, insufficient food supplies, and inadequate medical care.
This ruling from the Supreme Court—a rare intervention—recognizes the humanitarian ramifications of the prolonged conflict, following numerous complaints from human rights organizations. The Israeli judiciary has previously been reticent to contest state policies, largely siding with governmental actions justified as necessary for national security.
The three-judge panel unanimously asserted that the government has a legal obligation to provide three meals a day to Palestinian inmates to uphold a basic standard of living. This decision was influenced by a petition from the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) and the rights group Gisha, which contended that the deliberate withholding of food is part of a broader systemic issue affecting Palestinian detainees.
Furthermore, the court's ruling was a stark reminder of the conditions inside Israeli prisons, where reports have indicated that 61 Palestinians have died while in custody since the conflict intensified. The Israeli Minister of National Security, Itamar Ben-Gvir, criticized the ruling, suggesting that it undermines efforts to maintain security while defending judicial considerations that seem to favor Palestinian detainees over Israeli victims of violence.
ACRI has called for immediate adherence to the ruling, emphasizing that the state must not subject detainees to starvation regardless of their legal status. The ongoing challenges of maintaining humanitarian standards in the context of military conflict remain at the forefront of public discourse in Israel.
The court's decision comes in the wake of an escalation in violence after Hamas launched an attack on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 individuals, primarily civilians, which prompted Israel to adopt stringent measures against suspected militants across Gaza and the West Bank. As a result, many Palestinians have been detained under harsh conditions characterized by overcrowding, insufficient food supplies, and inadequate medical care.
This ruling from the Supreme Court—a rare intervention—recognizes the humanitarian ramifications of the prolonged conflict, following numerous complaints from human rights organizations. The Israeli judiciary has previously been reticent to contest state policies, largely siding with governmental actions justified as necessary for national security.
The three-judge panel unanimously asserted that the government has a legal obligation to provide three meals a day to Palestinian inmates to uphold a basic standard of living. This decision was influenced by a petition from the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) and the rights group Gisha, which contended that the deliberate withholding of food is part of a broader systemic issue affecting Palestinian detainees.
Furthermore, the court's ruling was a stark reminder of the conditions inside Israeli prisons, where reports have indicated that 61 Palestinians have died while in custody since the conflict intensified. The Israeli Minister of National Security, Itamar Ben-Gvir, criticized the ruling, suggesting that it undermines efforts to maintain security while defending judicial considerations that seem to favor Palestinian detainees over Israeli victims of violence.
ACRI has called for immediate adherence to the ruling, emphasizing that the state must not subject detainees to starvation regardless of their legal status. The ongoing challenges of maintaining humanitarian standards in the context of military conflict remain at the forefront of public discourse in Israel.
