CHICAGO (AP) — A coalition of protesters, journalists, and faith leaders moved to withdraw their lawsuit against the aggressive tactics of federal immigration officers in the Chicago area, asserting that the Trump administration's 'Operation Midway Blitz' has largely concluded. While the move is seen as a win, the case was heading toward a skeptical appeals court. Attorneys noted that senior Border Patrol official Gregory Bovino has left Chicago for North Carolina, though sporadic immigration arrests continue under other federal agents.
David B. Owens, an attorney for the plaintiffs, remarked, 'We won our case the day they left town. The people of Chicago stood up to the Trump administration’s bullying and intimidation.' The attorneys highlighted a 223-page opinion from U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis that had previously issued a preliminary injunction restricting federal agents' use of force during arrests.
The outcome of the order remains uncertain after an appeals court deemed it 'overbroad' last month but also cautioned against misinterpreting its stay on Ellis’ injunction. Arguments before the three-judge panel are scheduled for later this month. Meanwhile, the plaintiffs and attorneys continue to laud the impact of their legal fight against what they term excessive force and civil rights violations witnessed during the crackdown, which has seen over 3,000 arrests since September in Chicago and surrounding suburbs. Attorney Steve Art emphasized the importance of documenting the operational brutality faced by civilians, claiming this led to the vindication of constitutional rights in the region.
As debates around immigration enforcement continue, DHS has defended its Chicago operation, citing ongoing efforts to target criminal activity amid perceived hostility from crowds.
David B. Owens, an attorney for the plaintiffs, remarked, 'We won our case the day they left town. The people of Chicago stood up to the Trump administration’s bullying and intimidation.' The attorneys highlighted a 223-page opinion from U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis that had previously issued a preliminary injunction restricting federal agents' use of force during arrests.
The outcome of the order remains uncertain after an appeals court deemed it 'overbroad' last month but also cautioned against misinterpreting its stay on Ellis’ injunction. Arguments before the three-judge panel are scheduled for later this month. Meanwhile, the plaintiffs and attorneys continue to laud the impact of their legal fight against what they term excessive force and civil rights violations witnessed during the crackdown, which has seen over 3,000 arrests since September in Chicago and surrounding suburbs. Attorney Steve Art emphasized the importance of documenting the operational brutality faced by civilians, claiming this led to the vindication of constitutional rights in the region.
As debates around immigration enforcement continue, DHS has defended its Chicago operation, citing ongoing efforts to target criminal activity amid perceived hostility from crowds.
