WASHINGTON (AP) — The legal drama surrounding the January 6 Capitol riots is intensifying as defense attorneys for Brian J. Cole Jr. assert that President Donald Trump's blanket pardons for those charged in the incident should also apply to their client. Cole, who is facing charges for allegedly planting pipe bombs near the Democratic and Republican party headquarters on the eve of the riots, is arguing in a recent court filing that his actions are inextricably tethered to the events that unraveled at the Capitol a day later.

In their filing submitted to U.S. District Judge Amir Ali, Cole's defense team contended that the context of Cole's alleged conduct on January 5, 2021, should allow for dismissal of his case based on the pardons issued by Trump, which were aimed at more than 1,500 defendants involved in the Capitol attack. The defense is seeking to have the charges thrown out before the trial commences.

Prosecutors from the Justice Department have not yet provided a written response to the defense's claims, but they previously indicated in legal documentation that Cole denied any connection between his actions and the Capitol riot during interviews with FBI agents.

Since his arrest, Cole remains in custody as the defense appeals for his pretrial release, which has been denied thus far by the court. The trial date for Cole has not yet been established.

Cole's legal team also pointed out that the Justice Department has framed the charges against him in a way that ties his alleged planting of the explosives to the joint session of Congress that was disrupted during the January 6 events. They argue that their client's actions were politically motivated, reflecting the sentiments prevalent among the rioters who stormed the Capitol.

Notably, Cole has been diagnosed with autism and obsessive-compulsive disorder, and has no previous criminal record. This has led his attorneys to advocate that context surrounding his condition should also be taken into account as the case progresses.

The controversy embodies a broader discussion of accountability and the implications of presidential pardons on criminal proceedings related to events that have significantly impacted American democracy.